NAM Perspectives
The National Academy of Medicine’s digital journal provides a venue for leading health, medical, science, and policy experts to reflect on issues and opportunities important to the advancement of our mission.
Search
Topic
Issue Area
Pillar
Program
Fellowship
Award

Sep 2, 2014Discussion Paper
Essential Stewardship Priorities for Academic Health Systems
Biomedical ResearchCoverage and AccessHealth Policy and RegulationPopulation HealthPublic HealthWorkforce and Interprofessionalism

Jul 10, 2013Discussion Paper
Bringing a Systems Approach to Health
Although the U.S. health system excels in several areas, its overall performance remains uneven in terms of safety, quality, value, and the health outcomes achieved. One important lever to address these performance gaps is the use of structured, evidence-based systems-engineering approaches, which have been used successfully by many other industries. When these approaches have been applied to health and health care, they have often brought about significant improvements in care quality, value, patient safety, patient experience, and overall health outcomes. Yet, such approaches remain generally underutilized in the health system, and their potential for improvement remains largely untapped.
A systems approach improves health by considering the multiple elements involved in caring for patients and the multiple factors influencing health. By understanding how these elements operate independently, as well as how they depend on one another, a systems approach can help with the design and integration of people, processes, policies, and organizations to promote better health at lower cost. These approaches can be useful for all levels of the health system—patient-clinician interaction, health care unit, organization, community, and nation—with different tools available for the needs at different levels and across levels. These tools include production system methods and other management systems to help organizations continuously improve their operations and identify problems; queuing theory and operations management to ensure that resources are available when patients need them; and human-factors engineering to spot safety, quality, and reliability challenges by understanding how humans interact with technologies and processes. Spreading these systems principles more broadly will require specific technological supports, such as more advanced data systems and interoperable devices; supportive culture and leadership; engagement of patients, families, clinicians, and the broader public in these methods; and new incentive structures.
Health Policy and RegulationPayment ReformQuality and Safety

Apr 23, 2013Discussion Paper
From Pilots to Practice: Speeding the Movement of Successful Pilots to Effective Practice
Rising health care costs continue to stress budgets at all levels—family, employer, state, and national. At the same time, the results from health care are not commensurate with this level of investment. But there is cause for optimism that results can improve: the large number of individuals and organizations around the country who are involved in substantive efforts to improve care by piloting new care practices, care delivery models, payment methods, and other initiatives, thereby building an evidence base about what works and spreading that knowledge more broadly. To take best advantage of these activities, practical strategies are needed to accelerate and improve the planning, evaluation, scale-up, and spread of these initiatives. By improving the process for pilot projects, the potential becomes greater for large-scale improvements to the health care system—and the achievement of better care at lower cost.
Biomedical ResearchHealth Policy and RegulationQuality and Safety

Jul 26, 2012Discussion Paper
Demanding Value from Our Health Care: Motivating Patient Action to Reduce Waste in Health Care
Coverage and AccessHealth Policy and RegulationQuality and Safety